Jump to content

Path 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with Path 26, a set of AC electrical transmission lines in California.
Path 27
Path 27 as seen on U.S. Route 50 in Utah. An AC transmission line has since been built alongside this segment of the HVDC line.
Path 27 as seen on U.S. Route 50 in Utah. An AC transmission line has since been built alongside this segment of the HVDC line.
Location
CountryUnited States
StateUtah, Nevada, California
General directionSouthwest
FromIntermountain Power Plant near Delta, UT
39°30′27″N 112°34′49″W / 39.50750°N 112.58028°W / 39.50750; -112.58028
Passes throughSouthern Nevada
ToAdelanto Converter Station in Adelanto, CA
34°33′4″N 117°26′14″W / 34.55111°N 117.43722°W / 34.55111; -117.43722
Ownership information
OwnerIntermountain Power Agency (IPA)
OperatorIPA
Construction information
Manufacturer of substationsAsea,[a]
ABB Group (2011 upgrade)
Construction startedMay 1, 1984
Construction cost$1.1 billion[1]
CommissionedSeptember 16, 1985[1]
Technical information
Typeoverhead transmission line
Type of currenthigh-voltage direct current
Total length488 mi (785 km)
Power rating2,400 MW[2]
DC voltage±500 kV[b]
No. of poles2
No. of circuits1
Websitehttps://www.ipautah.com/

Path 27, also called the Intermountain[c] or the Southern Transmission System (STS),[4][5][6] is a high-voltage direct current (HVDC) electrical transmission line running from the coal-fired Intermountain Power Plant near Delta, Utah, to the Adelanto Converter Station at Adelanto, California, in the Southwestern United States. It was installed by Asea, a company based in Sweden, and commercialized in July 1986. The system is designed to carry power generated at the power plant in Utah to areas throughout Southern California. It is owned and operated by the Intermountain Power Agency, a cooperative consisting of six Los Angeles-area cities, the largest member being the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), and 29 smaller Utah municipalities.[7][8]

Path 27 consists of an overhead power line 488 miles (785 km) long,[d] and is capable of transferring up to 2,400 megawatts (MW) of power at ±500 kilovolts (kV),[b][e] higher than the power plant's operational output of 1,900 MW. The resulting maximum current is 4,800 amperes.[f] Given its length, a direct current (DC) is preferred to the more common alternating current (AC) as it allows the electrical energy to travel farther with minimal loss to resistance and requires no intermediate stations. It is bipolar, meaning that it has two conductors of opposite polarity (in place of three conductors for AC lines). Both conductors for the entire length are three cables bundled together; this is done to reduce the effects of EM interference and enhance the power line's performance. At each end of the line is a converter station that changes AC to DC on one side and back again on the other. Each terminus also features a dedicated ground which is connected by an electrode line to a grounding site away from the converters to provide ample earth return; this helps protect the main line and equipment from faults, and allows the system to operate at partial capacity.

Sections of Path 27 are paralleled by other AC transmission lines, including some of 500 kV. The powerline is also visible from the Interstate 15 which it passes over multiple times.[10]: 14, ch. 9  The HVDC line's converter stations will be replaced as part of a project to repurpose the Intermountain Power Plant as a hydrogen-burning facility. The stations are expected to go online by June 2026.

Overview

[edit]
Map of WECC's transmission grid. Path 27 can be seen as a diagonal line labeled "27" between central Utah and southern California.
Rough chart of WECC's transmission grid, with Path 27 highlighted in yellow.

Background

[edit]
Path 27 may be identified by its uniquely-designed steel lattice pylons and two conductors. The tower's height, insulation, and separation of conductors and their thickness meet the specifics for a 500-kV circuit. Compare to a lower-voltage, conventional three-phase power line on the right.

High voltages are typically needed to convey large quantities of electrical power over a vast distance, while also minimizing the amount of energy lost to resistance in the conductive cables as a byproduct from a high current; that is, raising the voltage lowers the amperage for the circuit, according to Ohm's law.[11] Whereas high-voltage transmission routes commonly employ a three-phase alternating current (AC) to move electricity in a to-and-fro fashion, high-voltage direct current (HVDC) lines, such as Path 27, carry power in only one direction. A direct current (DC) also incurs less loss of energy than AC over the same distance;[12] in other words, DC can sustain power much further than AC, which may require intermediate stations, or "taps," along the route.[13] Another disadvantage for AC is that power tends to flow on the outer layer of the conductor, a phenomenon called the "skin effect." DC eschews this problem; it allows power to penetrate the entire thickness of the conductor for optimal capacity.[14] Finally, DC circuitry has been chosen for Path 27 because the cost of transmitting power over its distance is lower than with AC,[13] which is best economically suited for shorter stretches.[15][16][g] HVDC is also cheaper because it utilizes fewer than three conductors, translating to less materials and subsequently allaying the cost of infrastructure and equipment used.[12][17]

Asea, a multinational electrical supplier based in Sweden, managed the framework and supplies for Path 27, and was a chief contributor for the power line's installment.[18] The number in "Path 27" is assigned by the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC), which oversees the electrical transmission grid across the American West, to distinguish this line from the other critical transmission routes.[3]: 4–5  A 2010 report indicated that Path 27 was also the most congested electrical pathway within WECC's territory,[19] though the system is able to handle such heavy usage.[3]: 145 

Path 27 is owned and operated by an inter-municipal syndicate known as the Intermountain Power Agency (IPA), thus lending it the alternative name Intermountain.[c] The IPA's roster includes 29 Utah municipalities (amidst them two suburbs of Salt Lake City, and Logan as the northernmost participant) and six Southern California cities.[20][8] The cooperative was founded around this mission:

[Intermountain Power Agency’s mission] is to utilize its assets to provide reliable, economic and legally compliant energy products and services for the benefit of its Purchasers, members, and other stakeholders, which includes supplying a ready energy resource reserve and supporting direct and multiplier economic contributions to rural communities and the State.
— IPA

Among its objectives is funneling excess energy to communities in Southern California; Path 27 was built to fulfill that purpose. The topmost SoCal client by population on the list is the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), the preeminent utility provider for Los Angeles, which also receives the greatest share of power through the plan ahead of Anaheim, Riverside, Pasadena, Burbank,[21] and Glendale (as shown in the table below). Altogether, these members acquire the biggest proportion of energy under the IPA.[22]

End-Users of Path 27
(based on net rating of 1,800 MW)
LADWP 48.617%
Anaheim 13.225%
Riverside 7.617%
Pasadena 4.409%
Burbank 3.371%
Glendale 1.704%
Total 78.943%
Source: Participants & Services

History

[edit]

The earliest concept of Path 27 likely originated in 1973, coinciding with an energy crisis of that decade plaguing the U.S. During that year, after the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation warned of a forthcoming energy shortage, representatives for the Utah-based Intermountain Consumer Power Association (ICPA) convened with Southern California localities in a quest for newer power sources and for investors.[10]: 1, ch. 1  The IPA established in June 1977.[23]

A crucial step for Path 27 came with the Intermountain Power Project (IPP), which emerged in 1974 as a program for financing the construction of a coal-fired generator, though it was not until 1977 that Utah's legislatures formally endorsed IPA's implementation of the project.[24]: 23 [h] Caineville in Wayne County, UT, was one of several locations suggested for the power plant,[10]: 55, ch. 1  prior to settling upon the site north of Delta in Millard County, or west of Lynndyl as stated in the sanction.[10]: 77, ch. 8  After clearing environmental checks, the generator broke ground on October 9, 1981, with $300 million in initial funds.[i] The original plan called for four thermal units, 750 MW aside,[10]: 6, ch. 1  but it had decreased to two due to concerns over precipitous power demand.[20][25] The generator's first unit was erected in 1983. The first batch of coal was delivered by train on July 2, 1985, and the first unit came online later that year. The second unit was actuated on June 13, 1987, bringing the plant to its fullest capacity of 1,500 MW.[23] It would be bolstered to its present-day 1,900-MW productivity in 1989,[4][26] hence rendering the electrical generator the largest in Utah by yield.[27]

Transmission Line Completed On Time

Completing this large and complex project on schedule is a tribute to a productive work force and excellent contractors.

Mike Pontius, Davis County Clipper[23]

However, Path 27 fully materialized when the transmission line's construction commenced on May 1, 1984, and took slightly more than sixteen months to complete.[28] [j] Various American contractors were commissioned for certain aspects and segments of the line; for instance, one entity from Georgia built 239 miles (385 km) worth from Adelanto, California to Moapa, Nevada, and another from Mississippi took on the remaining 250 miles (400 km) till Delta;[23] but perhaps the most notable obligation for this turnkey project rested upon Asea,[k] who imported the conductive cables and pieces for the galvanized steel-lattice support pylons[10]: 44, ch. 1  to be assembled on the spot. One phase entailed the emplacement of the pylons' cement foundations,[10]: 48, ch. 1  which are twenty feet (6.1 m) in average depth per pylon and vary in shape based on the tower's height and weight.[23] Newspapers reported that rocky, jagged terrain often posed challenges for accessibility and had likely necessitated copious excavation and even dynamiting. In all, six hundred workers were deployed for the labor.[23] The line achieved revenue service in July 1986[6] after the ignition of the power plant's first coal-burning unit, even though a document by LADWP attests that it might have been energized as early as December 1985.[29] Depending on official tallies and news accounts, the total cost was $1.1 billion.[1]

Finally yet equally integral for Path 27 are two converter stations (see below), which were inaugurated along with the transmission main, and are vital for its functionality. IPP's converter was installed in conjunction with the power generator, while the second converter in Adelanto and a tangent switchyard began rising on May 26, 1985, and finished in June 1986[30] in time to receive freshly-borne energy from borders over. LADWP supervised the construction of the combined facility and tasked Asea with the responsibility of the accouterments.[18][k]

Later history

[edit]

Since its inception, Path 27 saw upgrades and refinements around the latter turn of the century—the IPP's latest proliferation included. At the behest of LADWP and Southern California Edison, ABB Group and Hitachi Energy modernized the transmission line in 2008 and 2011, respectively, with improved control and protection technology[l] alongside supplemental filters and cooling systems at each terminal.[4][2] This helped raise the power line's capacity to its modern-day level of 2,400 MW.[31]

Installation

[edit]
Path 27 is best illustrated in this simplified block diagram of a bipolar HVDC system.

Transmission

[edit]

The primary component of Path 27 is the transmission line itself, which travels a length of 488 miles (785 km)[d] entirely aboveground through southwestern Utah, southern Nevada, and southern California. As opposed to three phases, Path 27 has two poles; one positive (cathode) and another negative (anode);[17] making this a bipolar configuration.[32][33] It exerts 1,000 kV total,[34] or 500 kV per pole, and is rated for 2,400 MW,[35] giving it a maximum current rating of 4,800 amperes;[f] by comparison, the Intermountain Power Plant (IPP) generates up to 1,900 MW, thus adding to the line's fault tolerance. On most HVDC systems, power can be sent in either direction;[36] Path 27 transports electricity from Utah to California under normal circumstances.[24]: 2 

Any conductive material engenders electromagnetic radiation whenever electricity flows through it. A single cable carrying such high voltage would produce particularly strong radiation in the form of a corona discharge[14] that can deprive electrical energy and cause EM interference on radio and communication devices.[37] For this reason, Path 27's conductors comprise three cables fastened together, or are triple-bundled. This not only reduces the detrimental effects of discharge,[38] it also provides more surface area for power to flow, thereby improving transmission efficiency.[39] Each cable is made of aluminium strands enveloping a steel core for strength and durability,[40] and the composite measures 1.8 inches (46 mm) in breadth.[10]: 44, ch. 1 

Two shield wires are mounted above the main conductors and shared by the same support pylons. These wires guard the power line against lightning strikes.[41][m]

Converters

[edit]
Further information: HVDC converter

Both sides of Path 27 feature a converter station, which bridges electrical power between AC and DC circuitry and is ubiquitous to HVDC projects worldwide.[42] The converters are located at the IPP station north of Delta, UT, and the Adelanto Converter Station in Adelanto, north of San Bernardino, CA.[20][43]

Path 27's terminals
(Power moves from left to right of gallery)
  • HVDC converter station with valve hall close to center of image.
    The Adelanto Converter Station is the end point of the HVDC line.
Path 27 uses stacks of thyristor valves similar to these on the HVDC Inter-Island in New Zealand. Note the person for scale.

The heart of the conversion process transpires in clusters of electronic valves that procedurally modify the flow of electricity in a manner similar to switches.[44] The type of valves on Path 27 is thyristor,[45] technology popular in HVDC since the late 1960s.[46][47] The valve configuration is identical for both converters: 24 stacks about 50 feet (15 m) in height of 24 valves apiece (or three "quadruple-valves"),[46] organized into twelve modules[30]—a single valve contains 144 thyristors.[n] As a matter of redundancy, the valves at both terminals are grouped two by six; should one be disabled, the other can pick up the slack above its designated capacity for a limited duration.[30] The entire assemblage is housed in a hangar-like enclosure called a valve hall that protects it from the weather and airborne dust.[48] The valves are affixed on tall insulators that separate them from the interior walls, floor, and ceiling; done to hinder induction and premature grounding, as well as aid cooling.[49] Path 27's valve halls are also fortified against earthquakes.

As the IPP converter is adjacent to the power plant, electricity is generally fed into the HVDC line from this terminus. Ingress for power to the system is preceded by a row of transformers[50] that step up the voltage level to 500 k. Next, it infiltrates the valve hall through enormous bushings that protect the building from damage caused by arcing. Inside the hall, the valves pipe the electrical flow from AC to DC in a complex process called rectification.[o] On the DC circuitry back outside sits a sequence of filters and reactors that reciprocally smooth out the DC supply[50] and serve to cushion the facility from disturbances as a result of power surges.[51] The electricity is then sent on its way down Path 27.

The Adelanto Converter Station demarks the receiving end of the HVDC line and has relatively the same layout, but the conversion mechanism is reversed. Beyond another set of reactors and filters, the inpouring power enters the valve hall to be carried over to AC circuitry anew—this is inversion,[p] and it blocks any power backflow on the AC conduit from reaching the valves to enforce unidirectional movement.[44] The electricity advances through a second tier of transformers before disemboguing onto diverging AC lines to be dispersed across the vicinity.[52][51][q]

Ideally, Path 27 can work in the opposite direction, with the Adelanto terminal becoming a rectifier, and the IPP an inverter,[54] although this seldom happens out of practicality.[3]: 147 

Grounding system

[edit]
Grounding node locations:
39°18′58.309″N 112°55′19.066″W / 39.31619694°N 112.92196278°W / 39.31619694; -112.92196278
35°2′50.427″N 116°42′13.495″W / 35.04734083°N 116.70374861°W / 35.04734083; -116.70374861
[r]

Like any HVDC scheme, Path 27 needs to be grounded at both ends in order to operate with respect to the earth.[56][57]: 3  Grounding provides the electric current a common path back into the earth, which serves as a neutral point for the circuit.[58][59]

Even with safeguards and a substantive fault tolerance, failures on the line can and do occur, thence grounding becomes a workaround for continued reliability of the system.[60] If one pole develops a fault, its current is diverted via the ground return to complete the circuit.[61]: 3  This de-energizes the problem conductor, while the second pole remains active;[57]: 18  in technical terms, grounding allows the power line to function as a monopole instead of a bipole.[61]: 1  However, it halves the line's overall capacity.[61]: 3  A pole may also be taken offline by the same means for maintenance, ensuring the safety of work crews. This contingency precludes the need to shut down the whole HVDC system and interrupt the power source, yet it is temporary, as the earth return on a bipolar system is not intended for prolonged use.[62][61]: 1–3 

HVDC exhibits significant potential such that the converter's onsite grounding devices are not enough to withstand alone, and a return current would otherwise cause issues at the electrical facility including rapid metal corrosion,[57]: 47–50  so the grounding nodes are set at remote locations.[56] On Path 27, the IPP converter's grounding point is situated about 22.2 miles (35.7 km) southwest of the valves (here), while the Adelanto converter's lies about 53.85 miles (86.66 km) to the northeast (here) on the edge of a playa known as Coyote Lake.[55][63][s] These spots were chosen in part for high conductivity within the earthen minerals.[61]: 10–38  Each node covers an area of approximately 0.25 square miles (0.65 km2).

At each grounding point is an array of buried conductive rods that form an electrode, marking the actual transition into the earth for the current. Within the electrodes for Path 27 are sixty rods[t] arranged in a circular rim about 3,000 feet (910 metres) in diameter[55] and spaced evenly for the best result.[57]: 21  Each rod is placed vertically to reach subterranean layers with the least resistivity possible:[56][57]: 21, 74  IPP's electrode rods are 285 feet (87 metres) deep, and Adelanto's extend 200 feet (60 metres) downward.[61]: 45  The rods are individually encased in a perforated-metal tube, or a "well," to retard corrosion.[57]: 23  The wells are filled with petroleum coke to enhance the current's connectivity into the soil.[57]: 82  Additionally, the coke regulates heat that the rod naturally emits when a current is induced;[57]: 89  this is to mitigate the electrode's impact on the surrounding environment.[56][57]: 79  A series of jumper cables radiating from the center of the circle feed the return current into the rods. At the center on the surface perches a small structure called a terminal house,[61]: 42  which is also equipped with a transmitter that helps technicians monitor the electrode's performance.[64][57]: 133–136  The "deep-well" setup of Path 27's electrodes is a variation of the "ring-style" electrode found on other HVDC projects such as the Nelson River Transmission System in Canada.[57]: 20 

The converters are linked to the electrodes by a pair of conductive cables, each measuring 1.407 square inches (908 mm2) in thickness, to enable physical contact with the earth. These are the electrode lines,[56] arteries for the return current—more precisely, the electrode line carries the current to the terminal house which then injects it through the electrode.[57]: 135  Starting at both termini, the electrode line runs atop Path 27's main pylons in lieu of shield wires before branching off along a standalone set of steel utility poles. Steel poles have been selected for their resiliency in the hot, arid locales.[65] The electrode line for the IPP converter has a total length of 30 miles (48 km), and the Adelanto's extends 59 miles (95 km).[66][61]: 45  Uniquely, Adelanto's electrode line travels underground for its final two miles (3.2 km) approximately till the grounding site.[55][64]

The electrodes and electrode lines are distinct from the "metallic return," which would involve an extra third conductor along the span of Path 27—the former HVDC Vancouver Island being an example. Such method would likely be infeasible for its scope and magnitude.[67]

Route

[edit]
The Old Spanish Trail meanders beneath Path 27 in Utah.
Path 27 crossing Interstate 15 outside Yermo, CA. Three electrical lines of various voltages parallel this leg of the HVDC line.

Following the regular power flow, Path 27 begins at the Intermountain Power Plant in Utah and heads briefly west before curving southward, passing over the U.S. 50/U.S. 6 duplex west of Hinkley. The DC line ventures though legions of dry basins and high mountains in the state due southwest; all the while crossing Utah Routes 21, 56, and 18; before reaching Nevada about 5.5 miles (8.9 km) north of Arizona's northwestern corner, simultaneously entering the Mojave Desert.

Inside Nevada, Path 27 traverses the Mormon Mesa, bypassing Glendale and crossing the Muddy River. It bisects the Moapa River Indigenous Reservation lands[10]: 50, ch. 2  before crossing Interstate 15 near Crystal. Across Las Vegas Valley, the line meets with NV 564 while riding through the Frenchman Mountain, straddles the River Mountains bypassing Henderson, and crosses Interstate 11 at Railroad Pass before heading into Eldorado Valley. Upon traversing the McCullough Range, it descends into Ivanpah Valley, missing Primm in its north and crossing Interstate 15 again; shortly thereafter, it enters California.

Path 27 cuts across isolated, oft-rugged tracts of the High Desert[10]: 4, ch. 5  while also encountering CA 127 north of Baker. Now in the Inland Empire, the line proceeds through Victor Valley where it crosses Interstate 15 once more near Yermo, as well as old U.S. 66 and Interstate 40 between Daggett and Newberry Springs. It then encounters CA 247 south of Barstow. Around Bell Mountain, Path 27 meets with Interstate 15 one last time, and then old U.S. 66 a second instance and U.S. 395 near Oro Grande[10]: 7, ch. 5  before reaching Adelanto, where the line arrives at its final destination of the Adelanto Converter Station.[55]

Numerous AC transmission lines parallel Path 27 throughout its course.[68] A 345-kV circuit runs beside the DC line interlinking the IPP and a wind farm near Milford.[4] A second 345-kV circuit leading to the Harry Allen Generating Station joins Path 27 near Cedar City. North of Mesquite, both are joined by a 500-kV line connecting the decommissioned Navajo Generating Station; the three travel somewhat within eyeshot of Interstate 15 until a solar park near Crystal. An assortment of 500-kV transmission corridors then follow Path 27 through Las Vegas Valley toward another collection of solar farms outside Boulder City. From Ivanpah Valley onward, two more 500-kV circuits and a third of 287 kV accompany Path 27 across the desert—these three constitute WECC Path 46.[3]: 197  By Victorville, Path 27 splits from the three AC routes but is once again shadowed by others of various voltages before culminating in Adelanto. Stringing multiple circuits on the same right-of-way is often favored, as it consumes less land per mile.[69]

Future

[edit]
See also: Intermountain Power Plant § Natural gas and green hydrogen plant plans

The coal-firing powerhouses at the IPP site are to be retired by 2027;[22][70] this adheres to LADWP's wishes for reducing its dependence on fossil fuels in favor of greener energy.[7] The plant will be replaced with a gas-powered facility specially tailored for harvesting hydrogen by 2025,[71] and paired with at least two solar farms on nearby parcels.[72][73][74] The sources will beget 840 MW and 300 MW at peak, respectively, or 1,140 MW when combined, still lower than Path 27's maximal capacity. This "renewal project" also calls for both converter stations to be replaced and activated by June 2026,[31][43][75] as well as improvements to Path 27 to lengthen the power line's service life.[76]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c "Construction of the Intermountain Power Project's 490-mile transmission line..." UPI. September 17, 1985. Retrieved 2023-01-04.
  2. ^ a b "Intermountain Power Project; Case Study". Hitachi Energy. Retrieved December 14, 2022.
  3. ^ a b c d e "WECC Path Reports" (PDF). WECC. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  4. ^ a b c d Beshir, Mohammed J.; Bjorklund, Hans (2012). "Upgrading the Intermountain HVDC Project to handle 480 MW additional Wind Power". ABB Library. Cigre. Retrieved December 14, 2022.
  5. ^ "Early Power Generation". Water and Power AssociatesEarly Power Generation. December 9, 2022. Retrieved 2022-12-09.
  6. ^ a b "Southern Transmission System Project". Southern California Public Power Authority. Retrieved 28 December 2022.
  7. ^ a b Roth, Sammy (2019-07-11). "Los Angeles is finally ditching coal — and replacing it with another polluting fuel". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2020-08-19. Utah's Intermountain Power Agency owns the coal plant and the power line, known as the Southern Transmission System.
  8. ^ a b "Participants & Service Areas". Intermountain Power Agency. Archived from the original on 2020-08-03. Retrieved 2020-08-19.
  9. ^ Csanyi, Edvard (August 20, 2014). "The choice of system voltage according to ANSI standard C84.1". Electrical Engineering Portal. Retrieved 26 November 2022.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Intermountain Power Project Environmental Statement (Report). Bureau of Land Management. 1979.
  11. ^ Grady Hillhouse (September 24, 2019). How do Electric Transmission Lines Work? (YouTube). Practical Engineering.
  12. ^ a b Wiley, HVDC Transmission, p. 3
  13. ^ a b Mughees, N. (February 7, 2021). "HVDC vs HVAC power transmission systems". Engineering360. Retrieved November 24, 2022.
  14. ^ a b Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, p. 2
  15. ^ Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, pp. 2-3
  16. ^ Wiley, HVDC Transmission, pp. 7-8
  17. ^ a b "High Voltage Direct Current HVDC Transmission". Allumiax. November 5, 2020. Retrieved 2023-01-04.
  18. ^ a b The second HVDC transmission to Los Angeles, ABB, retrieved 2015-08-15
  19. ^ Lesieutre, Bernard C.; Eto, Joseph H. (October 2003). "Electricity Transmission Congestion Costs: A Review of Recent Reports". US Department of Energy. p. 1. Retrieved July 5, 2023. Transmission congestion occurs when there is not enough transmission capability to support all requests for transmission services, and in order to ensure reliability, transmission system operators must re-dispatch generation or, in the limit, deny some of these requests to prevent transmission lines from becoming overloaded.
  20. ^ a b c Crispin-Little, Jan (October 2003). The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Expanding the Intermountain Power Project (PDF) (Report). University of Utah. pp. 1–3. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  21. ^ Bleveans, Lincoln (13 March 2014). "Where Does Burbank's Power Come From?" (PDF). Burbank Water and Power. Retrieved 28 December 2022.
  22. ^ a b "This tiny Utah town could shape the West's energy future". Los Angeles Times. 2022-05-19. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  23. ^ a b c d e f "Intermountain Power Project (IPP)". utahrails.net. January 21, 2019. Retrieved 2022-12-09.
  24. ^ a b Zillman, Donald (1986). Controlling Boomtown Development: Lessons from the Intermountain Power Project, Part One (Report). Land & Water Law Review. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  25. ^ "Project History & Location – Intermountain Power Agency". Retrieved 2022-12-15.
  26. ^ "Coal-Fired Power Plants in Utah". Industcards. Retrieved 2012-02-19.[dead link‍]
  27. ^ "The Intermountain Power Plant (IPP) is a large, coal-fired power plant near Delta, Millard County. IPP has a capacity of 1,900 MW, enough to serve roughly 1.5 million households. About 75% of the power produced by IPP is exported to Southern California". Utah Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 2022-12-04. Retrieved 2022-12-04.
  28. ^ "Historical LADWP Facts & Figures". waterandpower.org. Water and Power Associates. December 9, 2022. p. 35. Retrieved 2022-12-10.
  29. ^ "Historical LADWP Facts & Figures". waterandpower.org. Water and Power Associates. p. 36. Retrieved 2022-12-10.
  30. ^ a b c d Adelanto Converter Station, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, c. 2011, archived from the original on 2014-02-05
  31. ^ a b "Hitachi to supply converter stations to multi-state 2.4 GW power line". pv magazine USA. 2023-03-29. Retrieved 2023-04-19.
  32. ^ Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, pp. 8, 12
  33. ^ Wiley, HVDC Transmission, p. 21
  34. ^ Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems p. 8
  35. ^ IPP Station Overview and History, slide 6
  36. ^ Wiley, HVDC Transmission, p. 110
  37. ^ Daware, Kiran. "Corona discharge - its effects and methods of reducing it". ElectricalEasy.com. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  38. ^ Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, p. 110
  39. ^ "Advantages of Bundled Conductors". Electrical 4 U. October 28, 2020. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  40. ^ Cockfield. Bryan (11 June 2019). "A Field Guide To Transmission Lines". Very Strong Wires: Hackaday. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  41. ^ Wiley, HVDC Transmission, pp. 213-214
  42. ^ Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, pp. 12-14
  43. ^ a b "Intermountain Power Plant Renewal, Millard County, Utah, USA". NS Energy Business. Retrieved 2023-06-23.
  44. ^ a b Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, p. 21
  45. ^ Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, pp. 9, 11
  46. ^ a b Schulze, H.-J.; Niedernostheide, F.-J.; Kellner-Werdehausen, Uwe; Przybilla, Jens; Uder, Markus (2022). "High-Voltage Thyristors for HVDC and Other Applications: Light-Triggering Combined with Self-Protection Functions". ResearchGate. Retrieved December 15, 2022.
  47. ^ "Modern HVDC Thyristor Valves" (PDF).
  48. ^ Tatum, Malcolm (November 20, 2022). "What Is a Valve Hall?". About Mechanics. Retrieved 2022-12-12.
  49. ^ "Converter Stations - HVDC - AlternativeUniversity.net". alternativeuniversity.net. Retrieved 2022-12-12.
  50. ^ a b Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, p. 14
  51. ^ a b "Station Layouts - HVDC - AlternativeUniversity.net". alternativeuniversity.net. Retrieved 2022-11-27.
  52. ^ Wiley, HVDC Transmission, p. 13
  53. ^ Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, p. 105
  54. ^ Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, p. 13
  55. ^ a b c d e "Google Maps". Google Maps. Retrieved 2023-06-25. "Measure distance" tool used.
  56. ^ a b c d e Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, p. 127
  57. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m General Guidelines for HVDC Electrode Design (PDF). Cigre. January 2012. ISBN 978-2-85873-378-1.
  58. ^ Wiley, HVDC Transmission, p. 229
  59. ^ "Grounding - Energy Education". energyeducation.ca. Retrieved 2022-11-27.
  60. ^ Wiley, HVDC Transmission, pp. 6-7
  61. ^ a b c d e f g h Holt, Richard J (April 1997). "HVDC Power Transmission Electrode Siting and Design" (PDF). Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Retrieved November 26, 2022.
  62. ^ Padiyar, HVDC Power Transmission Systems, p. 12
  63. ^ "A Pilgrimage to the Buried Electrical Network Outside Los Angeles". Gizmodo. 2014-01-10. Retrieved 2022-12-09.
  64. ^ a b "Coyote Dry Lake Return Electrode | The Center for Land Use Interpretation". clui.org. Retrieved 2022-12-02.
  65. ^ Sims, John (November 6, 2019). "Pros And Cons Of Steel Utility Poles". Critter Guard. Retrieved 2022-12-10.
  66. ^ Sibilant, G. (November 2010). "HVDC Ground Electrode Overview" (PDF). Electric Power Research Institute (Updated ed.).
  67. ^ Wiley, HVDC Transmission, p. 17
  68. ^ Wiley, HVDC Transmission, p. 384
  69. ^ Kryukov, Andrey (4 November 2022). "Power Flow Modeling of Multi-Circuit Transmission Lines" (PDF). Energies. 15 (21). MDPI: 8249. doi:10.3390/en15218249. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  70. ^ Tucker, Carol (21 April 2020). "The Future of IPP Is Green - Transforming L.A.'s Last Coal Plant to Help Reach 100% Renewable Energy". LADWP. Retrieved 2020-10-14. Engineering studies had determined that 840 MW was the minimum generation capacity needed to maintain sufficient voltage for the critical transmission systems to operate reliably.
  71. ^ Roth, Sammy (2019-11-19). "Climate change activists urge Los Angeles not to build a gas plant in Utah". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2020-10-14. The utility plans to replace Intermountain in part with an $865-million plant that runs on natural gas. ... LADWP officials claim that without a traditional power plant at Intermountain, they won't have the physical ability to transport solar and wind energy through the transmission line to Los Angeles. They also say they hope to eventually fuel the gas plant with clean-burning hydrogen, although the technology is still being developed and could be prohibitively expensive.
  72. ^ IPP Station Overview and History, slides 39-40
  73. ^ "LADWP May be Buying Utah Sun". 18 September 2013.
  74. ^ Greg, Intermountain Power Plant & Green Hydrogen, slide 3
  75. ^ IPP Station Overview and History, slide 33
  76. ^ "Public Finance Team Advises the Southern California Public Power Authority on Bond Deal". Norton Rose Fulbright. April 2023. Retrieved July 5, 2023.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Asea and Brown, Boveri & Cie were merged to ABB on January 1, 1988.
  2. ^ a b The symbol ± denotes a dual voltage power supply for a bipolar system of 500,000 V and -500,000 V.
  3. ^ a b More formally the Intermountain Power Project Direct Current (IPP DC) Line.[3]: 144 
  4. ^ a b The circuit length is twice the value at 976 miles (1,571 km).
  5. ^ The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) classifies 500 kV as "extra-high voltage" along with 345 kV and 765 kV.[9]
  6. ^ a b Calculated by: A = W ÷ V, where A = amperes, W = watts, and V = volts.
  7. ^ From an investment standpoint, constructing overhead AC lines is cheaper than HVDC lines when the length is below 400 miles (600 km). Up to 500 miles (800 km) and beyond, however, makes HVDC a more attractive option. This range is called a "break-even distance." See also: AC network interconnectors.
  8. ^ In 1977, Governor Scott M. Matheson signed into law an amendment to the Utah Interlocal Cooperation Act aimed at streamlining the creation of IPA, which soon asserted control of the IPP in 1980.[10]: 1, ch. 1 
  9. ^ The IPA requested an additional $900 million in 1983, one of the largest outlays by an inter-regional collateral in U.S. history.
  10. ^ Two HVDC lines had originally been slated, and the project would have allocated an estimated 24,400 acres of land, not counting access and service roads.[10]: 44–45, ch. 1 
  11. ^ a b Asea and Brown, Boveri & Cie were merged on January 1, 1988 and ABB was created.
  12. ^ Hardware in place is by MACH2.
  13. ^ Lightning storms frequently take place between July and August in parts of the Mojave Desert that Path 27 traverses. This weather pattern is due to moist air migrating from Baja California during the monsoon season.
  14. ^ That amounts to 165,888 thyristors for Path 27.
  15. ^ This process is found in most rechargeable battery appliances.
  16. ^ The inverter on a solar power system uses this process.
  17. ^ Adelanto's converter connects to a 500-kV bank, so the transformers here merely act as a buffer against overvoltages.[53] They are reputedly the largest ever manufactured to the U.S. by ABB Group.[30]
  18. ^ The distance between Path 27's grounding nodes is approximately 361 miles (581 km).[55]
  19. ^ By comparison, that grounding site is about 21 miles (34 km) east-northeast of central Barstow.
  20. ^ The rods themselves are elements divided into segments interlaced with smaller cables.[57]: 22  This allows the elements to expand and contract.

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Path 27 (Western Interconnection).
Map all coordinates using OpenStreetMap

Download coordinates as:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Path_27&oldid=1247846646"